
If there’s one thing that’s easier with a fountain pen than a ballpoint, it’s the ability to make more creative letterforms.

Is this all that’s missing from the Stateside cursive debate? A little bribery positive reinforcement? Yeah, maybe. According to Editor-in-Chief Elliot, the German kids all go to the store at some point and pick out their first fountain pen, which gave me an a-ha moment. In other countries, kids are forced at some point to use fountain pens. I remember being stoked to write in thin lines of indelible blue ink instead of fuzzy, erasable graphite. Or maybe it was that regardless, eventually you got to use a pen instead of a pencil. Was it the rote memorization of these hieroglyphs? The excruciating attention to detail that our teachers seemed to pay to our handwriting when it came to grading literally anything? Maybe it was the fact that in the States, there’s no real rite of passage attached to learning to write in either script or cursive, except that you escaped the bad marks in the penmanship department. You’d think we would have appreciated learning a way of writing that was more like us - a blur of activity, everything connected, an oddly-modular alphabet that was supposed to serve us well in adulthood. It was as though our handwriting was moving from day to night, changing and moving as fast as we were. We practiced our D’Nealian (So fancy! So grown-up!) on something called Zaner-Bloser paper, which is still used today, and by probably second grade were making that transition from easy Zorro-like lowercase Zs to the quite mature-looking double-squiggle of the cursive version. Me and my fellow Xennial zeigeistians learned a specific printing method called D’Nealian, which was designed to ease the transition from printing to cursive with its curly tails on every letter. I started learning to write in kindergarten, but that of course was in script, with separate letters. Notice the stroke order and the ridiculous capital Q.īut let’s back up a bit. Make sure that "C:\Program Files\Adobe\Acrobat 10.0\PDFMaker\Office\PDFMWord.dll" is a valid DLL or OCX file and then try again.) The only fix is to repair Office 2010 and reboot.D’Nealian cursive. I attempted to re-register PDFMWord.dll, but am unable to do so even as an admin using cmd line (I get: The module "C\Program Files\Adobe\Acrobat 10.0\PDFMaker\Office\PDFMWord.dll" was loaded but the entry point DllRgisterServer was not found. I have reregistered C:\Program Files\Adobe\Acrobat 10.0\PDFMaker\Office\PDFMOfficeAddin.dll. I have scoured the registry and have not found any differences between an affected machine and a working one. This particular symptom has a specific fix: re-register the regsvr32 "C:\Program Files\Adobe\Acrobat 10.0\Acrobat Elements\ContextMenu.dll" Do you want to enable the add-in(s) for conversions to PDF? Clicking no still produced the PDF.Ģ) The third right-click context menu (Combine Supported files in Acrobat.) was also missing after WordPerfect installation.

#Wordperfect office 14 pdf#
Two odd observations which may be connected?:ġ) Even though it was confirmed that the COM Add-in in Word was enabled correctly, saving as PDF from backstage view produced: Acrobat PDFMaker add-in(s) are currently disabled.

Print to PDF still works as expected, as do the first two options of the right-click context menu (Convert to Adobe PDF and Convert to Adobe PDF and EMail), as well as the Save as Adobe PDF from the backstage view of Word, so the converter itself appears intact. Our core image appears fine, but we have encountered an issue where after installing WordPerfect X5, Adobe Acrobat X (Standard or Pro) will no longer recognize word documents when attempting to convert using the "Create PDF" link under the Getting Started column of the quick start splash screen (e.g.
#Wordperfect office 14 windows 7#
Our firm is rolling out Windows 7 / Office 2010 32-bit with Adobe Acrobat X and we are using SCCM.
